Peer Feedback

Feedback to peers:

1) Julia's Blog: Your blog is very informative. It is well presented and draws the reader’s attention to the various topics being discussed. I thoroughly enjoyed reading your blog posts as I felt that were written in a way which is accessible to all readers and all people. I especially liked the point you made about where children can use games for educational purposes - aside from games being simply for fun. A possible constructive critique I have is potentially using more graphics such as images or videos. I believe this will become more eye-catching and may communicate different messages aside from the written text. Also, make sure to reference correctly. Overall, well done, really enjoyed reading it.

2) Sarah's Blog: Your blog is educational and pleasing. I really liked your visuals as they related to the written text. I really enjoyed reading your posts as they were both full of important and relevant information – great use of scholarly articles. A possible constructive critique that I have it that is would be great to include an audio-visual aspect, whether it be a YouTube clip or a video from the internet to further back up your claims. Overall really well done!

Feedback from peers:

1) I was really impressed with Camilla’s blog. Firstly, the display of it overall was eye-catching and extremely easy to navigate through. It was clear and easily understandable which is always positive. I especially liked the point made in blog 2; ‘Could I live without digital communications and technologies’, that discussed how it is important for her as it made it easier to communicate with her relatives overseas; a point many people would be able to relate to. Adding to this, her first blog ‘Do I really need to become a reflective practitioner’ made a favourable point, as she brought her job as a pre-service teacher into the equation to help further her argument of the importance of being a reflective practitioner. Overall, this blog was extremely informative and well-presented.

2) Did not receive feedback from a second person.